<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Science Needs a Reset Button as The Stink of Intellectual Corruption is Overpowering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pathstoknowledge.net/2009/12/04/climate-science-needs-a-reset-button/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pathstoknowledge.net/2009/12/04/climate-science-needs-a-reset-button/</link>
	<description>What is actually real in Objective Reality? How do you know? Now, prove it's real!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 23:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lark</title>
		<link>http://pathstoknowledge.net/2009/12/04/climate-science-needs-a-reset-button/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathstoknowledge.net/?p=3373#comment-457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nitpick: neigh -&gt; nigh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nitpick: neigh -&gt; nigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hudson duster</title>
		<link>http://pathstoknowledge.net/2009/12/04/climate-science-needs-a-reset-button/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hudson duster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pathstoknowledge.net/?p=3373#comment-448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first heard of this theory twenty years ago. We&#039;d spent weeks learning the environment was incredibly complicated and consequently nothing should ever be altered by humankind because the end result was unpredictable. Then we came to global warming - they weren&#039;t mincing words with &quot;climate change&quot; back then - and suddenly all uncertainty disappeared. If CO2 increased, then temperature rose; no doubt was allowed. Of course, at break time the prof would muse to sycophants about other outcomes, but that disappeared when the lecture restarted. It was all about attitude for the cause and scientific inquiry was second place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first heard of this theory twenty years ago. We&#8217;d spent weeks learning the environment was incredibly complicated and consequently nothing should ever be altered by humankind because the end result was unpredictable. Then we came to global warming &#8211; they weren&#8217;t mincing words with &#8220;climate change&#8221; back then &#8211; and suddenly all uncertainty disappeared. If CO2 increased, then temperature rose; no doubt was allowed. Of course, at break time the prof would muse to sycophants about other outcomes, but that disappeared when the lecture restarted. It was all about attitude for the cause and scientific inquiry was second place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

